Parsel tongue

Today we will discuss about origin of Languages. We believe that universe is formed by BigBang and evolution of man kind. Then man kind should have evolved from Animal kingdom. Read my previous post if you want to train your mind in this theory. I came across a theory which traces the hierarchy of humans by genetical study and conclude the origin point as adam's point. Based on this theory the Madurai Kamarajar University has found the first Indians. This will be very interesting to rewrite the history and unlearn the existing history. When you think after reading this adam's point theory. Then the first question comes to mind is what language those humans would have spoke? Whether to accept that human originated from adam's point only? Why can't be other origins too? Another famous origin theory says river beds are the origin of civilization. But we should carefully understand that from adam's point to origin of civilization there is span of time. Historians say the span of time(transition period) would be 10,000s of years. But we can say that language was not part of their lifes during this time because these period are highly insecure period. They had fought many wars with animals and between them to reach a civilize point. For our convenient, we can jump to a timeline where they have started civilization on river beds and they have reached different rivers from multiple adam's point which is mostly near to the river. During transition period there were no technology, no boat, no vehicle, no education and they have not reached the iron age but they would had some stone weapons for defense. These were the early humankind without caste, culture, music and politics. These are the period of inventions. Currently we are discovering which is already invented. Since they are from different adam's point these groups of people wouldn't know each other. If they have met each other how would they have spoken to each other? This is real mystery. But the need and wants of people were very very less. They didn't want to fight with each other rather know each other. Initial contact of people would have been to know each other and acceptance and love would have predominant between them. So language wouldn't be a barrier for love. They would have shared their lanugages too. So initial man had a mother tongue and only after a migration there is a need to learn another language. Before that there was no need to learn even any language because mother tongue is not a language but the native way of communication. So before taking you to next thought process I want to pray to Goddess of Knowledge to bless me with courage. And pray to these river Goddess to flow into the minds of reader (Sindu, Saraswati, Ganga, Godhavari, Narmadha, Kaveri, Pahruli). Why did I pray to these river goddess? Because I am not living in adam's point today. I could source to anyone of these river mothers. Currently my genes would have all of these mother's source. But if we see which would be predominant then I will believe Kaveri or Pahruli but I might be wrong. Today we are speaking different languages, majority of Dravidian language shares same roots. And other language roots to Sanskrit. My yoga guru have acknowledged that in all the Indian languages Tamil is less influenced by Sanskrit.

The oldest stone scripture of Sanskrit in India dates to 1600BCE. Before that people had communicated to each other, respected each other and married between clans. There were no need for any foreign languages to communicate between clans. River Saraswati stopped flowing. Those people were in hunger and poverty. They tried to find a river to migrate. This is famously called as migration of Aryans. They migrated to east and west. That's is why Sanskrit is called as Indo-European language. People were poor and suffered with no food. Neighboring civilization give them shelter and food. Since these people had no land in neighboring civilization they were given place to live. This period is called as Rigveda period. These people had their own practices of offering yagnas to Indra and other devas. You need to understand there are no temples built. But the Dravidian people had Stone worship (Nadukal valipaadu) that's why you would see mentioning of animal sacrifices in Rig veda and not in other vedas. People who opposed yagnas are called as Asuras(not their people or not devas). During this period, Buddha raised and pulled people to his path and asked no to follow these yagnas. During Rig veda period there were no puranas. Puranas are written after the rig veda period. Early man had worship god in different ways. Check out my all the posts what are the different siddhanthams. The Aryans need to learn other languages because they have to live in foreign land. The Saraswati river people migrated into the Indus and Ganges more than the current Dravidian land. Since they were poor and aliens with their practices they had to learn and adapt to the foreign land customs. This land had faced all kinds of slave-ism. Man to man battles loser will be killed or become slaves. Language to Language battles to find who is better when one wins other become slaves. Yes there were language battles had happened. Tamil people were asked by Sanskrit scholars to burn their documents and leave them in river on auspicious day so that they get credit in next birth. Whatever the Thanjavur university maintains as ancient text of Tamil are the one escaped from fire. Tamil vedams and Many have burned in the language battle.

Now it is called as mother of other languages. Science proves with adam's point approach that cuneiform were the birth of languages and Egyptians disappeared with cuneiform that is not considered as language. But the pyramids can't be built today with Sanskrit or Chinese or Japanese. The technological advancement doesn't require any particular language rather a strong belief and communication between people. Language is only a medium to learn the science. You are trying to discover which is already invented and already present in universe. I pray to all these mother goddess to bless eternal to others because one is in a hunger to swallow others.

Sailing with Dravida Krishna

Today we are going to discuss about how this historical events are rewritten as mythology. The famous belief of Indian history starts from Indus valley civilization. But I am against it. I believe Sangam age existed and it can be older than what we think as history of India. So let me try to pull some point which I have come across reading these days. Sanskrit texts says Manu a Dravidian saved the humanity. And it says there were previous Manus before him. So this gets us into mythology than historical events, because we haven't found any archeological evidence of the Cities mentioned by Sangam texts. But I have few different perspective. When Manu brought his citizens from South he should be geographically different skin because people in Tropical would have different skin and people from Equator region would have different skin tone. When mythological Krishna is depicted as dark skin person then this historical events can be linked to say that Krishna is a Dravidian that's why tropical region people have seen him having different skin tone and mentioned him. The story of Mahabharatam has many events that will fail the test of science. And it was written very very later than the historical event. Because when the under water city of Dwaraka was found near Gujarat many people started believing that Mahabharatam was true historical events and it dates 9500yrs old. So we will also believe Mahabharatam is historical event. But since it was written much later than it happen we can relate to the neighbouring civilization and understand few things. If the dates are pushed to 9500yrs back then we could see Memphis existed during that period. Egypt was at their peak of civilization. And their scripts are in the form of symbols. So if we start believing Historical Krishna then what about the people and kingdom near to him? that makes they were also existed historically and their scripts would have been like symbols(may or may not). But we find the original Mahabharatam written in Sanskrit first which is readable in current day too. This makes us understand that Mahabharatam would have happened during a time when the clans was using symbols still to communicate. 

If you want to relate Mahabharatam as historical then you should link Gauravas as Kuravar and Pandavas as Pandiyar. Only when you take this prespective you can continue travel historical else you will remind in mythology. Yes this is a battle between Kuravar clans and Pandiyar clans in Dravida nadu. We should understand few realities then we can understand my point of view. Sanskirt scholars had practise of writting the historical events as mythology. To merge with the existing world they always change the names to existing world and merge with mythology. That's how the historical names gets into different form. All tamil names will get changed to mythological names. If you look at Mahabharatam as historical events then 2 references can be related and understood.

1. Thuthuveni, Newspaper rock utah.

When we see this rock painting and their culture and names you can relate them to Tamil and see a connection. But if you see from a mythological lens you will miss many. These clans call themselves as Hopi and their gods name is Kachana. We know the story of gopis and krishna. If Krishna is historical and they lived in a time where symbols were used to communicate then you can connect to Hopi clan where gopis as Hopi and Krishna as kanchana. And this is found in current central America and well protected. You can think why and how people would have traveled that long. is it possible? I will highlight a prespective that can create a belief in you to believe there is a possibility to reach there. So remember Krishna was a Dravida and he advocated not to offer prayers to Indra he had his own commanments which was little different to what was practised at his time.

2. Sembavalam, Heo Hwang Ok - Korean.

This is an event mentioned in Korean history that their king married a princess who came from India. They mention that she came from Ayuth Kingdom via sea. So when people were able to travel to Korean peninsula then they had enough technology to travel to any part of the world. Since this is very old people at that time whoever come from different land they consider them as god and worship them. Koreans of Kim clan consider her as God. I have shown many reference about the similarities between Tamil and Korean language. Since she was a queen she would have obviously influence over the clan than a normal person. Thats why you could see many word and meaning are similar between these languages.

When we can take history to back in 9500yrs old period. This geography and Kingdoms had different boundries and different languages. When you find the Dwaraka near Gujarat then you should understand that these dravida people were spreaded from Indus to equator region. There are mentioning of Kapatapuram in Ramayana where second Tamil sangam happened. And true historians read and locate the ancient lanka near Kapatapuram and not the current Srilanka(this is a mythology) There were period in history where River Thamaraprani flowed inside Srilanka there were no sea in between them. Lanka is just a measurement to locate the place in ancient times. Since this mythology was written in Sanskrit first it was related to their world names. Ancient India was very different than what we think. With Tamil we can travel back to historical period in ancient India but with Sankrit we can construct the mythology. So when you want to take a step to connect to ancient India then we need to read and learn about Tamil history.

One Fine Tree

Today we are living in the planet with multiple belief system. One conflicting with others when we say this that tells we have gone through the length and breadth of it. We should investigate why this conflict exists still. Even after experiencing the divine in you, if people are not seeing everyone as their kith and kin and act against them then you have not attained the higher state of love and you are not eligible to spread your ideas. We should understand few concepts of human consciousness. An individual have a consciousness and he/she has a belief system in it. This can be different for each individual.
Bhrammaanandham and Prammaanandham.

Each individual has a belief system that is truth for himself, let's say he/she is born in strongly religious family. He reads learns practices a life style which forced upon him. Whether it is correct or wrong he has to live out of fear. This life style doesn't allow him to go with his natural thinking. Unless you break out of the religious rules it is not possible to enter the heaven. Religious belief say you die and attain a place in heaven. But Its not the only type of belief with respect to heaven. This Bhrammaanandham believes it in this way. But there are other Bhrammaanandham which believes in different way. One of the way is to see that I and the world is no different. Very few Bhrammaanandham believes this and live. i.e I the self is just a prison. Switch off the identity that i am so and so. When you do that you are no different than the breathing plant. Just to wittiness the life you remain breathing. When the plant grow then it becomes a tree. That's why the tree is behind a guru. This witnessing and tree like feeling sometime closely related to Prammaanandham. In this state  the tree give fruits and the animals take it. Don't tell a human, he might cut down the tree.

Gnani and Nirvaanaa, A two different thing

Today I am going to discuss about Brahma Nirvaanaa. What is this? Is it a person or a specific group of people? People give these titles to specific group, sect and selected people. People relate these terms with a person or religious identity. People don't see these as general concept which describes the state of mind of human beings. What is this state in the mind? Who all can attain this state? Anybody can see this state in their own mind, Anyone, Men or Women, No caste/varna discrimination, No religious discrimination, No rich or poor partiality, but animals cannot see this state of mind, only human beings can see. People in the busy world from early morning to late night work, work and work. Always they do some actions like brushing, bathing, eating, driving, talking, working, thinking, playing, watching and sleeping. When we go to sleep how many get a good, satisfying and deep sleep? Not many* When sleep is not satisfying, then mind is not getting rest and slowly it becomes restless and it grows into accumulated stress. People don't do any action to get raid of this stress from their body and mind. In Ancient times people realized this state of mind and invented an action that can remove stress from the mind. People use to sit and relax and detach from the self and attain a state of mind and that is called brahma nirvaanaa/sunniya. Regular practice of Nirvaanaa removes stress and makes one highly active. In the due course you get happiness in day today activities. Regular attainment of Nirvaanaa brings detachment in actions and that's what Karma yoga is. People might confused and relate it to a state of body without clothes but I am referring a detached state of mind with clothes in body. When you are detached from self then one can see that I and the self which is composition of body and mind is different. That 'I' is called Brahmman that's you. When one detach from the self and see the Brahmman then he/she has attained Brahmma Nirvaanaa. Anybody can attain this status in life. But people confuse with Brahmma Gnani and Brahmma Nirvaanaa, earlier one denotes a person and later one denotes a state of mind. A person who regularly attaining Nirvaanaa is not a Brahmma Gnani. Brahmma Nirvaanis (eg. Buddha) are common in human clans but Brahmma Gnani is very rare, so far in the history of man kind Gnani can only be counted in fingers. People are not able to see Gnani and give recognition in society. When we say count of  Gnanis were in single digit in entire human race, then one should understand what is that status called Brahmma Gnani. People don't celebrate this occurance of Brahmma Gnani. Because people don't know how to identify a Brahmma Gnani. Will people learn the tricks to identify the Brahmma Gnani in future atleast?

Read Next
Seminar - click here to open